Email This Post - Print This Post Print This Post

By John Helmer, Moscow
  @bears_with

Following police raids last week on a reporter for the Murdoch press in Canberra and the Sydney office of the state Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC), journalists in Australia have appealed for international solidarity on press freedom —  a cause which they themselves have failed to defend when others were under the gun. Do they deserve it?

In money terms, journalism is an undeserving, unprofitable business everywhere. Newspapers in most of the English-language world are cutting journalist jobs – in the US at a rate of 45% over the past decade; about the same in the UK and Canada;  worse in Australia.

For those who want to keep their jobs,  police raids and prosecutions are reminders when self-censorship isn’t enough to prevent their investigating abuses of the law, war crimes, fraud and corruption. The first home truth is that truth is loss-making for an enterprise;  pauperizing for its reporter. The second home truth is that in wartime – that’s now – truth-telling  may be a criminal offence which will get the reporter time in jail.  

In the case of Julian Assange (lead image, extreme right), the first hearing on the US indictment and application for his extradition will commence in an English magistrate’s court on Friday morning. Although it’s a first procedural step in a process likely to take three years, the identification of which judge will preside is important. Not all English judges want to be responsible for rulings on whether Assange is facing political persecution and whether the US judicial system can try a national security case fairly. For background on the legal issues now at stake, read this  and this


Left: Home Secretary Sajid Javid has authorized the US extradition application and sent his decision for the courts to review. Currently one of the contenders for election as Conservative Party leader and prime minister, Javid said: “[Assange] is rightly behind bars… It is a decision ultimately for the courts, but there is a very important part of it for the home secretary and I want to see justice done at all times and we’ve got a legitimate extradition request, so I’ve signed it, but the final decision is now with the courts.” Right: Chief Magistrate Emma Arbuthnot is likely to preside in the case, according to Bar sources;  for her record for refusing extradition in cases involving the Russian courts, read these reports. Behind the scenes,  Sajid and the Lord Chancellor, the senior judicial officer in the UK, can influence the selection of the judge who will conduct the Assange case.  

In the case of Ivan Golunov (lead image, centre), the Russian reporter was targeted by businessmen engaged in a funeral business he was investigating. They tried warning him off. When he refused, they and their allies in the Moscow police, the federal Interior Ministry and the security services, arranged Golunov’s arrest and jailing on June 6 on fabricated drugs evidence. A Moscow court released him to house arrest on June 8, then dismissed the charges on Monday. On Wednesday the senior officials in charge of Moscow’s western district  were dismissed.


Left: Ivan Golunov in his first Moscow court appearance on June 6. Right, in an unprecedented show of solidarity, three Moscow business papers – Kommersant, Vedomosti and RBK – published front-page headlines proclaiming “I/We are Ivan Golunov”.

In Australia, the Australian Federal Police (AFP) raided the home of a Murdoch newspaper reporter in Canberra on June 6,  and the ABC headquarters in Sydney on the following day. The police claimed they were acting on search and seizure warrants approved by the federal Defence and Home Affairs ministries, though the Defence Minister claims she was not consulted in advance. The AFP has also changed its public statement of the legal purpose and statutory authority for  the  warrants. The cases the government is running relate to publications in July 2017 of Australian war crimes in Afghanistan;  and in April 2018 of proposed state surveillance of citizens without warrants.


Left: Rupert Murdoch, whose News Ltd  controls about half of Australia’s press.  His company issued a statement saying:  “This raid demonstrates a dangerous act of intimidation towards those committed to telling uncomfortable truths. The raid was outrageous and heavy handed. News Corp Australia has expressed the most serious concerns about the willingness of governments to undermine the Australian public’s right to know about important decisions Governments are making that can and will impact ordinary Australian citizens.” Right: David McBride, a former Australian Army lawyer, leaked the documents on which the ABC based its report of war crimes by Australian soldiers in Afhganistan. A Canberra court hearing is scheduled on June 13. McBride’s defence  is that government officials are legally obliged to report wrongdoing. “I’m seeking to have the case look purely at whether the government broke the law and whether it was my duty as a lawyer to report that fact,” McBride has said

For details of the war crime case, read this; and for background on the second case, click. Listen to the discussion with Chris Cook, broadcast on Thursday morning, Canadian Pacific time, running from the 2nd minute to the 26th.  Open the link here

Gorilla Radio is broadcast every Thursday on CFUV 101.9 FM from the University of Victoria.  The radio station can be heard here.  The Gorilla Radio transcripts are also published by the Pacific Free Press and on the blog.  For Chris Cook’s broadcast archive, click to open.   

Leave a Reply