By John Helmer, Moscow
  @bears_with

The Russians and Americans – think tankers, military bloggers, podcasters  —  now calling for President Vladimir Putin to decide on Oreshnik missile and tactical nuclear warhead strikes on NATO targets, outside the Ukraine, are hopeful that the NATO response would be deterrence, not escalation. But they don’t know.

They also do not know what the impact would be inside Russia, after nuclear war starts, on the management of the domestic economy for manpower mobilization, civil defence, militarization of the country’s resources, state takeover of the banking system and allocation of capital. They are hoping the oligarch base of the Russian economy, reinforced by the Central Bank, the state budget, and Putin’s personal promises, would be preserved intact.

In short, business as usual during nuclear war across Europe, with a discount, offset or write-off of as many casualties in a day or week as the Ukrainian and Russian armies have already suffered in four years of the Special Military Operation.

Hoping for this outcome isn’t predicting it, estimating the probability, or knowing with confidence. It’s hopium.

This is a psychological state which can be bought and paid for, like state propaganda, product advertising, or information warfare. It’s also an outcome of decision-making on which money can be wagered, like stockmarket pump and dumping, vitrification of corpses, and Viagra.  

Scientifically speaking, hopium is a pathology.  That’s to say, abnormal, irrational, negative for life expectancy. This is how scientists try to detect and measure it: “Hope is a complex cognitive-emotional-motivational state that attunes individuals to the possibility of desirable future outcomes (Ortony et al., 1990; Peterson and Seligman, 2004). The emotional components of hope reflect an anticipatory state often experienced as positively valenced (i.e., a pleasant state). Hope is also commonly conceptualized in terms of its cognitive and motivational components that tend to accompany the emotional experiences of hope (Malle, 2004; Peterson and Seligman, 2004; Geiger et al., 2019a). Some scholars have defined and measured hope in terms of a cognitive-motivational axis rather than an emotional experience (Snyder, 2002), while others argue that the motivational components central to Snyder’s definition of hope are not properly part of the experience of hope and better fit under the distinct concept of efficacy (Van Zomeren et al., 2019). Despite differences, all definitions share a common focus on hope as a future-oriented state that orients people toward imagining positive futures (Fernando et al., 2018; Kantenbacher et al., 2022).”

Apply that science and let’s discuss with Dimitri Lascaris what the warfighting options are right now, and the antidote to the pleasant poison that’s hopium. Click to listen or view: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mcF0umhHxU 

by Editor - Thursday, July 16th, 2026
No Comments »

By John Helmer, Moscow
  @bears_with

These are the pressing questions of the Russian moment:

Can President Vladimir Putin defend Russia from the escalating US-European war and at the same time preserve the oligarch economy at home?

Is there a combination of military escalation, including Oreshnik strikes on NATO territorial targets, with or without nuclear warheads, and business as usual in Moscow which Putin can decide and launch by surprise on E-Day (Escalation Day)?

Whose fault would it be if the answers to these questions happen to be Marxist (1^st lead image)?

“It’s not my fault if reality is Marxist” – that was the line attributed to the late Che Guevara (2^nd lead image), by the late Jean-Paul Sartre in 1960.  It was revived by the late Michael Parenti in 2006.  

It’s not the fault of President Donald Trump (3^rd lead image) that the war against Russia which he is directing is Marxist; and that the reality he is aiming to impose on Russia is more Marxist than Putin, the Russian oligarchs on whom he depends, and the podcasters supporting him from the University of Chicago, the CIA, and the US Army will acknowledge and allow.

Whose Marxist reality is proving to be more, er, realistic?

If you answer the first two questions with this third one, then you are about to realize that Putin cannot, will not, escalate his warfighting operations on the Ukrainian battlefield, on the high seas, or on NATO territory,  for fear of starting a revolution at home that will destroy the economic base, the oligarchy, which  put him in power in 2000; kept him in power since then; and keeps him and his successors secure for the foreseeable future.

The American and NATO Marxist warfighters understand this very well. Their Marxism comes out of the barrel of the gun, they are sure. Their war is a gun Trump has forced the NATO allies to pay him to supply, so that he and they can fire it from the Ukraine – no matter how few  Ukrainians can be press-ganged to man the front lines and survive the  Russian advance westward. They just signed the papers to provide $70 billion of this firepower and manpower for this year of the war, another $70 billion of it for next year.

They are aiming at production, supply, and trade of the Russian fuel and energy sector and of the farm sector; at raising the cost in state budget financing for defence; at lowering the profits of the bank sector; at threatening Russian lives from the drones in the sky above and from the mobilization of men to the front.

The aim is Marxist: to force a Russian revolution in the economic base which will trigger –they hope, plan, expect – either “fragmentation of Russia [with] a struggle over the nuclear arsenal, resources, borders and history”, or “Russia to become a fortress: closed, mobilised, in permanent siege.” That’s civil war or Stalin war, according to Andrei Melnichenko, the fertilizer and coal oligarch in a warning published in London last week.  

Putin has replied by summoning Vladimir Potanin, the nickel oligarch and co-founder of the loans-for-shares scheme which launched the Russian oligarchy in 1996. “Vladimir Olegovich,” Putin asked Potanin, according to the Kremlin communiqué, “you have a lot of areas of work in general, but in the main, how does the company feel?”  What followed in the communiqué was a prepared script on Norilsk Nickel.

What Putin really was asking was how the Russian oligarchs feel on the warfighting options now, before Putin must respond to the General Staff’s options plan for E-Day.  More than that, Putin was signaling through Potanin, not through Melnichenko, that he will restrict his escalation operations to those which the oligarchs accept. He was telling Potanin he will not risk their economic base to defeat Trump and the Europeans.  

That’s Marxist reality for you.

Click to listen to the questions and the answers in today’s discussion with Chris Cook on Gorilla Radio of Canada.  

by Editor - Wednesday, July 15th, 2026
No Comments »

By John Helmer, Moscow
  @bears_with

Conspiracy to commit murder is not a capital crime in the US state of South Carolina unless the murder plan  has twelve aggravating circumstances.   

Incitement to genocide is a crime in the state, though it, too,  is not punishable by death. Five years in prison is the standard sentence for both, plus fines of between $5,000  and $500,000.  

Lindsey Graham, the four-term senator representing South Carolina, suffered the death penalty on the evening of July 11; he had not been convicted of a crime in his state. The war crimes  he conspired to direct and finance, and the genocide against the Palestinian, Iranian and Russian nations he signed his name to,  live on without him as the policy of the Trump Administration.

There have been press reports in Moscow that Graham was executed by a Russian missile attack on the Skyfall drone factory which he and Vladimir Zelensky toured together  in Kiev on July 10.  In South Carolina, the convicted have the option to die by firing squad, electric chair, and lethal injection; bombing isn’t an option.

According to a Tsargrad report, there wasn’t time for Graham to catch the train out of Kiev to Poland (11 hours), then a plane to Washington (11 hours), land alive, and then die a few hours later into the Washington evening, purportedly of aorta dissection. The Russian report claims Graham was already dead on arrival in Washington. The rupted aorta reportedly is a fabrication to cover up the embarrassment to the Trump Administration of a successful assassination by President Vladimir Putin. Why Graham died but Zelensky survived the missile strike isn’t explained.

“There is one marker that can clarify a lot,” Tsargrad editorialised. “You need to monitor the funeral. If the terrorist senator is buried in a closed coffin, the funeral ceremony is not public, or he is quietly cremated in a private crematorium, this will dramatically increase the weight of the ‘kinetic hypothesis’, transferring it from the category of  ‘this is a puerile fantasy’ to the  category of ‘these things happen’.”  

President Putin and his spokesmen have said nothing about Graham. As for the targeting of military industry and drone factory targets in Kiev, Putin has been precise. On Monday, July 13 – when Graham was either dead of natural causes or Russian ones – Putin told an election rally that “our responses will always be mirrored, wherever they try to strike at the territory of Russia, we will respond in a mirror, only several times more powerful. The enemy will feel it. He already feels it, I hope, and he will feel it several times more powerfully.”   

Assassination of individual targets is terrorism, “pure terrorism”, as Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov declared the next day (July 14). Speaking in Moscow, Lavrov was asked about US-guided Ukrainian drone attacks on Russian shipping: “Moscow – and the President in particular – is working to put an end to all of this. What the Ukrainian regime is doing goes beyond piracy. At least pirates plunder for their own gain. Here, however, it benefits no one. The sole purpose is simply to cause damage and spread fear. It’s pure terrorism which manifests itself not only in the Sea of Azov but also in the Black Sea and Africa.”  

Killing Graham hypothetically – collateral damage for a decapitation strike aimed at Zelensky – that has been ruled out by Putin’s mirror. Decapitation strikes by the US and Ukrainians against Russian General Staff officers as they leave their homes in Moscow – that’s “pure terrorism” by the enemy, and Putin “is working to put an end to all of this.”

Exactly how – that is the point of the new podcast with Nima Alkhorshid aired live on Tuesday (July 14). Click to view or listen here.

For the moment, Putin is insisting that the war to defend Russia from the US, the NATO allies,  and the Ukraine must be conducted as a special military operation according to mirror matching,  escalation symmetry, and deterrence by red lines announced in public and demonstration firings, like the three Oreshnik shots – Dniepropetrovsk (November 2024), Lvov (January 2026), and Belaya Tserkov (May 2026).

Moscow sources report the assessment of both intelligence agencies, SVR and GRU, is that Putin’s escalation limits cannot counter, do not stop, and fail to deter the escalation of the drone war on the Ukrainian battlefield, the Russian hinterland, the territorial waters and the high seas. They add that the western allies are calling Putin’s bluff.

The sources claim it is now the recommendation of the General Staff, the Defense Ministry,  and the majority of the Security Council that Putin should drop the mirror, decide on asymmetrical measures, and authorize endgame escalation. “That decision is days away”, one of the sources said over the weekend.

The source believes the Russian military are now staking their honour on this decision because the alternative is “too little too late”, and “defeat by a thousand cuts.” Such a defeat is dishonour – “in practice, the Kremlin has only one option now.”  

by Editor - Tuesday, July 14th, 2026
No Comments »

By John Helmer, Moscow
  @bears_with

Does President Vladimir Putin believe in the magic mirror?

That’s the mirror which answers questions. “Mirror, mirror, on the wall”, it has been famously asked for hundreds of years, “Who in this land is fairest of all?”  

Putin’s personal advisor, Kirill Dmitriev —  the fairest in the land in his own estimation — was educated in the United States:  he believes the magic mirror is the creation of a Walt Disney cartoon.  

However, trained by the KGB to be fluent in German, Putin came across the mirror in  the Grimms’ fairy tale version. That first appeared in 1812  and was translated from German  into Russian and published in 1826.  

The Russian magic mirror followed in 1833 when Alexander Pushkin told the tale. It reappeared in Alexander Afanasyev’s collection of Russian folk tales, Narodnye russkie skazki.  In that Russian version, the magic mirror had been acquired by a prosperous merchant. One of its powers, the folk tellers said, was that “you could look and find out what was happening and where.”  The merchant’s wife used the mirror to discover that a rival, a woman more beautiful than she was, was living with two oligarchs – er, bogatyrs – in a forest nearby. So she sent her servant to kill her rival with poison. Once, twice, three times she tried until she succeeded.

I won’t spoil the story by retelling all that happened except that the beautiful girl survived to live happily ever after. The evil-wishing sorceress didn’t. She “was tied to a stallion’s tail, and the stallion galloped across a field and scattered her smashed bones over the bushes and the gullies.”  

When President Putin describes his operations in the war against the US and NATO allies on the Ukraine battlefield, he often refers to the mirror as his rule for escalation in the warfighting.  He means that for every escalation operation on the enemy side, he will order the General Staff to strike back tit-for-tat, symmetrically. This way Putin thinks he has preserved the Russian initiative and escalation control. He also thinks that the other side has the same magic mirror and will be limited to the same mirror rule, tit for tat, as Putin insists. What is magic about this mirror in Putin’s doctrine is that his mirror’s magic is more powerful than the enemy’s magic, and that if Putin’s keeps repeating this often enough, his magic will deter the enemy from escalating its war to destroy him.

Putin thinks the US and the NATO allies are afraid of being tied to the stallion’s tail and smashed to pieces. He doesn’t acknowledge that they believe he’s a donkey.

“Victory will undoubtedly be ours,” Putin declared in a speech to a Moscow rally, “Everything to Win”, yesterday.  “Our guys, the fighters, are moving forward,” he added.

“Our responses will always be mirrored, wherever they try to strike at the territory of Russia, we will respond in a mirror, only several times more powerful. The enemy will feel it. He already feels it, I hope, and he will feel it several times more powerfully.”  

This is Putin’s public response to the rising pressure from within the Security Council, the intelligence agencies, the General Staff, and in the media of the military bloggers for E-Day. That’s short for Escalation Day – not TFT (tit for tat), not TIT (Trust in Trump), not the symmetrical responses from the genie in Putin’s magic mirror.  

This is the plan for escalation of military operations to cut the Ukraine battlefield off altogether from its ground and sea supply links to the NATO alliance; to cut off the US and NATO drone targeting operations in the airspace of the Black Sea, and the Starlink and other satellite deployments in space; and to do as much as possible for Russia’s allies, starting on the Iran front, to inflict cost and pain on the US.  

Intelligence sources in Moscow have been expressing confidence that Putin, having no alternative now, will release the General Staff from the operational restrictions he has imposed since the start of the Special Military Operation in February 2022; most particularly “our responses will always be mirrored.”

In this latest statement, however,  Putin reveals that he believes he has an alternative.

The magic mirror.

(more…)

by Editor - Tuesday, July 14th, 2026
No Comments »

By John Helmer, Moscow
  @bears_with

The rupturing of the aorta which killed US Senator Lindsey Graham on July 11  causes sudden, excruciating pain across the chest; the internal bleeding causes death so rapidly most victims cannot be saved.

Graham’s fate is now to be inflicted by rapid enactment by the US Senate and House of the 500% tariff of the Graham sanctions bill on countries buying Russian oil, gas, uranium, coal, nickel, food grains.    The pain is aimed principally at China, India, Turkey.

The bleeding to death is planned to be the fate of President Vladimir Putin and Russia.

The Kremlin and its official media have issued no comment. Oleg Tsarev, the Ukrainian opposition leader in Crimean exile, published a death notice identifying the “very influential club”, to which Graham belonged, in which “there are no women or children. A very influential club.”  

Putin’s negotiator with the Trump administration for sanctions relief, Kirill Dmitriev, has fallen uncharacteristically silent without publishing a tweet for 48 hours.  

Over the same period,  press reports  have appeared in the Middle East confirming that  Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has decided to transfer his Russian S-400 batteries to one of three US allies in the war against Iran, Saudi Arabia, UAE or Qatar;  and to have ordered Turkish forces to raise their flag at bases surrounding the Russian naval base at Tartous and the Russian airbase at Khmeimim, near Latakia on the Syrian coast.  

Responding to criticism of Putin for “betraying” the General Staff on retaining the Syrian bases and on supporting Iran against its enemies, a Moscow source commented: “The official justification for Putin’s approval [of the resale of the S-400 systems delivered to Turkey between 2017 and 2019 but never fired] will be as hypocritical as the Americans — it will be a ‘defensive weapon’ to be used in ‘specified circumstances only.’ And that’s it.  I expect no limits to what the Kremlin will stoop in their money-making now. You can expect, a year from now, Russian S-400s and 500s will be sold direct to the Emiratis and Saudis. No doubt about it. Strictly speaking, the Turks do not have to do a resale. They will say they are giving military defensive cover, jointly with Europe and the US, to the Arabs; the Russians will go along with that.  Putin’s problem is more urgent: he has to win the war in Ukraine to have any say in anything anywhere. If he doesn’t decide on this now, he’s Gorbachev 1985, waiting to be dismembered and sold in pieces to the Arabs, Turks, Europeans, and Chinese.”

Another Moscow source has been reporting the anticipation among Security Council officials that Putin must agree to the General Staff’s escalation options “within days”.  

In this timing, by coincidence or by calculation, the Russian oligarchs supporting Putin have published an appeal to him with strings attached. These have been spelled out by Andrei Melnichenko and published by The Economist on July 9.   Melnichenko warns Putin, and also the Graham sanctioneers in the White House and Congress, against four “scenarios” – “a humiliated Russia, lingering on the periphery of the West”, “Russia in China’s orbit”, “the fragmentation of Russia, which would rapidly become unmanageable”, and “Russia to become a fortress: closed, mobilised, in permanent siege”.  

Moscow sources believe there are more options than these.

They say the Security Council has proposed to Putin to decide that if he is not to face slow bleeding defeat, he must commit now to “complete Russian victory cutting Ukraine off from Europe, NATO and the US;   decapitation or exile for the Zelensky regime; and for Kiev and the main cities to be run in the manner the US runs Iraq. That victory brings military to power in Moscow.”

This is anathema to the oligarch base on which Putin has depended until now, when, Moscow sources agree, that is impossible.

“Melnichenko is speaking at the behest of the state oligarchs clan of which [First Deputy Prime Minister Denis] Manturov is the face and coordinator”,   according to one source. “They know [Roman] Abramovich is not the right person to intermediate. They want to retain their external wealth and their Russian assets so they are floating a ‘nothing and everything is possible’ balloon – if need be, to open a platform independent of Putin, but if he will come to an accommodation, so much the better.”

They are worried, a source in a position to know claims, by “the prospect of a entire shift toward a Chinese-style takeover by a military-nationalist alliance, the state takeover of all oligarch assets, a change of leadership at Rosneft and the state banks. This may not be plausible for the Kremlin. But it is being floated now. And there are other scenarios which the oligarchs also oppose. One would be for Putin to preserve his continuity in power on striking a grand deal with India and China. The Indians will show the middle finger to the Americans if the Chinese will but not alone. Putin will have to join, too.”

Another Moscow source suggests Melnichenko’s pitch looks to “be orchestrated by the British – they might have his balls in a nutcracker and they are putting him up to it now to test some of Putin’s allies and high-ranking bureaucrats. The usefulness of [Mikhail] Fridman, [Pyotr] Aven, [Roman] Abramovich has expired. There must be several other plays in the works and [Melnichenko] could be the chosen one to make the next move.”

That’s for later, the source adds. “Right now the problem for Putin is that in facing the war which the US and NATO are escalating against him, they have a succession objective, but he does not. Putin has created no successor.”

by Editor - Sunday, July 12th, 2026
No Comments »

By John Helmer, Moscow
  @bears_with

Excerpts from the Red Pill Diaries with Rasheed Muhammad, podcast on July 11, 2026: click to view or listen:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5R4_bD4EcHs 

At the NATO summit in Ankara,  President Donald Trump has committed to maximum escalation against Russia risking and costing nothing for US voters but enriching the US military-industrial complex, the Trump family,  and their financiers.

The Kremlin strategy of sucking on TIT – Trust in Trump – has failed.

Russia is not able to send any message of pain to US voters in the way Iran has learned through its Hormuz Strait regime.

Our ruling classes are not running away in fear.

Empires don’t have to learn from their mistakes. Their victims do.

Most Russians are not Zionist. There is only one Zionist in the country – and that’s President Putin.

A hefty dose of the truth is better for your long life and health than a hefty dose of muscle-building fantasy.

(more…)

by Editor - Saturday, July 11th, 2026
No Comments »

By John Helmer, Moscow
  @bears_with

Even presidents-for-life reach their dotage like everybody else. They prefer to die in their own beds, also like everybody.

In these three recent pieces, the case is made that Putin’s Russia – reading number 1 by Paul Craig Roberts — and Erdogan’s Turkey – reading number 3 by Abdullah Bozkurt — are like everybody, too.

In reading number 2, the case is made by Andrei Melnichenko, a Russian oligarch whose power and fortune come from banking, fertilizers, and coal, that short of death in bed or in war, the rule of President Vladimir Putin should not be succeeded by battlefield defeat, Trojan Horse subversion, nor by military rule. Rather, Russian rule should be based on the peaceful co-existence of Russian capital with international capital; Melnichenko calls that “respect for national sovereignty”.

By Russian capital, Melnichenko doesn’t say but means his own and the Russian oligarchy. By  international capital, he doesn’t say but means the US empire and its satrapies, including the  wealth havens Dubai, St. Moritz and Zug, where Melnichenko has kept himself, his counting houses, aeroplanes and boats since 2014.   

Melnichenko is proposing to die peacefully in bed – that’s a Trump-brand bed for which Melnichenko is content to pay a license advance,  a management fee, and an annual royalty.

Putin has never explained why his understanding of capitalism, Russian and international, is neither the Marxist-Leninist version of his Soviet education, nor the liberal globo-American version of his political practice. That’s because he has never admitted in public his personal version of religious capitalism, which he confided in secret to President George Bush when they met in October 2001. ” There is a contradiction between a new, young, aggressive financial Islamic capital and the old one,” Putin said. “A moment came when the new generation began to see the old as its competitor.  From the time bin Laden became your partner, he felt himself your competitor. His desire to move to Central Asia or elsewhere was his desire to muscle in and subjugate all others to his will. In reality, it is a financial issue. Religion is secondary. The real goal is to have a place in the centre of world finances, a place that is already occupied. They want to push away representatives of Jewish capital or, if not, they will try to destroy the centre and shake it up and, ultimately in that way, to take its place.” 

Added to his fear of state capitalism,  communism, and socialism, which Putin has made public,  he has tried to balance the Russian economy between Islamic capitalism (Turkey, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia) and Jewish capitalism (Israel, the US), and ended up taking sides with the latter.

In the immediate future, Paul Craig Roberts concludes there will be no dying peacefully in bed in Russia for as long as the Trump administration is not deterred or defeated in the drone war. “It’s an escalation,” Trump said on July 8,   “but it’s also an escalation that can help lead to an end.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio explained what Trump meant. “What you’re discussing is the ability of Ukraine to reach deep inside of Russia and conduct strikes. I think that’s one of the dynamics that’s changed in this war over the last few months, and that is that the Russians are finding it more difficult to defend their own airspace. And what we hope that means is that it’s going to create the space now to negotiate the end of this war.”  

Deafness to what they are saying, not to understand  this, Paul Craig Roberts writes, is naiveté, folly, “extraordinary blindness to reality…Reality has proved to be too much for Putin.  He has proven himself to be unable to cope with clear and obvious challenges.”  

This is the appearance of Russian politics from the outside.

From the inside of Russian politics, Melnichenko has given a special interview with The Economist, which is owned by a group of oligarch families – Agnelli of Italy (43.4%), Stephen Smith of Canada (26.9%),    and Cadbury, Sainsbury, and Schroder of the UK.   Melnichenko has proposed that a nuclear-armed Russia cannot be defeated in the current war without nuclear retaliation, and that the alternative to that should be an international accommodation of the oligarchies.

The third piece documents the decline into the final stage of epilepsy by the Turkish president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, and the escalation this is causing of the contest to replace him from four candidates, not one of which is as committed to preserving the current Turkish strategy with Russia as Erdogan. “Rival factions within the ruling establishment, including the AKP, the cabinet and Erdogan’s own family, have reportedly been positioning themselves for a post-Erdogan era amid concerns that health complications could abruptly end his political career.”  

In the history of the Turkish sultans, abrupt ends haven’t been medical ones.

If you read these pieces at the beach, watch out that the sand doesn’t get into the pages. I’ve added a little myself.

(more…)

by Editor - Thursday, July 9th, 2026
No Comments »

By John Helmer, Moscow
  @bears_with

The Ankara Summit Declaration  is vague enough and precise enough to mean everything and nothing to President Donald Trump (lead image) and those he regards as his subordinates, clients,  and marks in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).

In White House politics, it balances between the party for escalation of the war against Russia and the party for de-escalation and peace; that’s to say, pause in the war against Russia.

In Kremlin politics, it tips the balance between the party for escalation dominance in the war and the party that trusts in Trump to deliver terms for de-escalation; that’s also to say, pause in the war against Russia.

The difference between the White House and the Kremlin is that President Vladimir Putin is running out of options and time to strike a balance between his two parties while Trump calculates he has plenty of time and doesn’t care to help or hinder Putin in his predicament because the war in Europe doesn’t count with US voters, and will make no difference to the outcome of the November 3 Congressional elections.

Putin’s predicament is that he has no more balancing options between the opposites, escalation dominance to victory and escalation loss to defeat. Any further delay will signal Putin’s uncertainty and prevarication — or weakness in the face of the enemy. To Russian voters who will decide the outcome of the September 20 State Duma elections, that signals loss of confidence, defeat. Moscow sources in a position to know claim Putin now realizes Trump will not save him from having no choice.

(more…)

by Editor - Wednesday, July 8th, 2026
No Comments »

By John Helmer, Moscow
  @bears_with

A mistake becomes a delusion when it is repeated, despite the obviousness of what can be seen  and the severity of the feedback.

What is the word for a person who keeps repeating the same mistakes, and what is the cure?

When the Artificial Intelligence (A) engines were marshalled to answer these questions, the “Overview” which came back was:  “A person who frequently or always makes mistakes is commonly called error-prone or incompetent. Depending on the severity and context of the mistakes, other terms include: Bungler or Blunderer: Someone who handles things clumsily and makes careless, stupid errors; Klutz: Best used for someone who is physically awkward and constantly dropping or tripping over things; Recidivist: A formal term for someone who repeatedly falls into the same bad habits or mistakes; Habitual offender: Often used in formal or behavioural contexts to describe someone who makes the same mistakes over and over.”

So as not to cause distress to individuals and loss of self-esteem, or trigger local laws on  discrimination against the handicapped,  the AI engines “generally agree that error prone is a great neutral term, while bungling and clumsy imply underlying physical or situation clumsiness”.

In Russian politics, during a national parliamentary election campaign, “error prone” isn’t a neutral term – it costs votes when the bunglers are held to account for their mistakes at the ballot box. In the present war, “error prone” can’t be a neutral term because it costs lives.

A mistake committed repeatedly during the combination of an election and a war is rare,  and so more difficult for the AI engines to give a name to.

The reason for this is that the global databases which the AI engines search for answers aren’t clear on whether mistakes committed on a vast scale of human destruction were mistakes at all. For example, is the genocide being carried out by the US and Israel against Palestine and Iran a mistake? Was the German genocide against the Jews and the Russians a mistake? The Turkish genocide against the Armenians? The British genocide against the Bengalis,  the Japanese against the Chinese, the French against the Cathars, the Romans against the Gauls, the Athenians against the Delians?  Etc.

Trying to answer these questions can trigger what AI technicians call hallucinations. In universities and think tanks, which do this sort of thing for their living, the answers are called  rewriting history.

Those who don’t agree with the re-write, don’t approve the answers, don’t accept the  hallucinations, often use their police powers to ban them and turn error-proneness into crimes,  send mistake repeaters to jail.

In European and American politics today, this process is called fascism. That’s not a hallucination at all.

In the new podcast with Nima Alkhorshid, we discuss the three looming Kremlin delusions in combating the escalation of NATO’s drone war; the trust in President Donald Trump to guarantee Russia’s security in Europe for the future, and the nazification of the European and American states for permanent war against Russia. Click to view or listen: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ezaX3h9ZMw 

by Editor - Tuesday, July 7th, 2026
No Comments »

By John Helmer, Moscow
  @bears_with

Is President Vladimir Putin facing a World War I moment of fight to destroy the threat or negotiate an armistice?  Or is he facing a German nazification moment of the 1930s? Or is Putin miscalculating who is in the “Party of War” and who can be deterred from joining it?

“The European party of war proceeds from a false perception of the overall situation and developments on the frontline,” Putin told President Donald Trump in their telephone call on Sunday (July 4).   He then tried to explain what is happening on the Ukrainian battlefield.

Whose perception is the false one?

Putin’s spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, said the next day: “There is a war going on, this is a real war. It all started as a special military operation. It continues like a war, because Berlin, Paris, The Hague, Oslo, and, unfortunately, Washington are behind Kiev. Because they are being helped to aim through their satellites, they are being helped to aim foreign weapons at our targets through their entire infrastructure.”  

Well,   if that’s what Putin believes, what good will it do for Putin to welcome back to the Kremlin Trump’s negotiators, Steven Witkoff and Jared Kushner? Peskov again, in the same press statement on July 5: “They’re busy right now. Once they have more time to spare, they will always be welcome in Moscow.”  

Trump failed to acknowledge the call with Putin in his daily tweeting.  But asked by a reporter on July 5 “why isn’t he [Putin] feeling any pressure after speaking with you?”, Trump replied: “Well, I think he does feel pressure. He wants to end it and Ukraine wants to end it, and we’re in talks and we’ll see if we can get it ended… And President Putin wants it to end, I will tell you that very strongly, good call. And President Zelensky actually wants it to end now. And we’re going to be going to NATO, and we’re going to be talking about it. And I think we’re going to get it — I think we’re going to get it ended. It’s been a terrible situation.”  

Putin insists that Trump doesn’t endorse, and won’t sign again, NATO’s strategy of permanent “pressure” on Russia. “I would like to note,” Putin told his military commanders at the front, “that both the Kiev regime and the purported European so-called peace makers, whose genuine objective is not peace but continuing the war with Russia to the last Ukrainian, reaffirm our assumption regarding their true intentions by their statements and practical actions. I want to stress that the June 7, 2026, joint statement by some of the EU leaders welcomed the innovative, as they put it, use of pilotless technologies by the Kiev regime.”

Putin was referring to the June 7 statement issued in London by the German, French and British leaders with Vladimir Zelensky.  “They discussed how to use the upcoming G7 summit at Evian, the next meeting of the Coalition of the Willing, and the NATO summit at Ankara to best coordinate further support for Ukraine based on its prioritised needs, including further pressure on Russia’s war economy and an increased pledge of military and defence support for Ukraine at the NATO Summit.”

Putin omitted to mention that ten days later, at the G-7 summit meeting at Evian on June 17, Trump signed this statement: “We, the Leaders of the G7, stand united in our unwavering support for Ukraine in defending its freedom, sovereignty, and territorial integrity… To support and accelerate this new momentum, we agree to increase the delivery of air defence capacities, additional systems and interceptors, and long-range capabilities. We are also ready to consider extending to Ukraine the benefit of licenses to allow for an increase in Ukraine’s military production… We commit to increase the pressure on the Russian war economy. In this context, we will strengthen our sanctions, including those on the oil and gas sectors. We consider this the right moment to proceed with additional measures.”  

Strategic pressure – Trump supports it.

Putin refuses to believe it.

(more…)

by Editor - Monday, July 6th, 2026
No Comments »