By John Helmer, Moscow
  @bears_with

Evidence from the US Air Force (USAF) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) released in federal court this week ahead of a bail hearing for Jack Teixeira, the junior airman accused of leaking top secret Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) briefing papers, reveals that Teixeira was under close surveillance and official investigation from September 2022 through February 2023. That is six months before he allegedly printed out the JCS documents, and then published photographs of the papers on a social media site.

The new USAF and FBI evidence records Teixeira pocketing handwritten notes of what he had been reading; there is no evidence of his being able to print out copies of the documents.

The court hearing, held on Friday afternoon May 19 in US federal district court in Worcester, Massachusetts, ended in a ruling by Judge David Hennessy to deny bail for Teixeira and keep him in prison while his state trial is prepared.  “The danger he poses to the community is a grave one,” Hennessy said during the 45-minute hearing. “Court states the relative law with respective to this matter,” the court clerk has recorded in the case docket. “Court grants the Government’s motion for detention, ordering the Defendant detained, and states reasons therefore.”

 “The decision was a victory for the government, which is seeking to send the strongest possible message to potential leakers”, the New York Times reported from the courtroom.  

The evidence revealed by the government , which the newspaper and every other mainstream and alternative medium in the US are failing to report, demonstrates the opposite.

by Editor - Friday, May 19th, 2023
No Comments »

By John Helmer, Moscow
  @bears_with

This is a tale about whales and Russians. In the telling, it has surprised even its author. A university professor from Oregon, he belongs to that seagoing pod which, like the North Pacific right whales,    is a seriously endangered species right now — that’s the American exceptionalists.

Ryan Tucker Jones’s book, Red Leviathan: The Secret History of Soviet Whaling, was published this month.  It has yet to be noticed in the Russian press. One reason is that the history of Soviet whaling and Russian fishing is no secret at all in Russia. The second reason is that the secret Russians know about Greenpeace and other campaigns against whaling that are part of the long US war against Russia is not one Jones has recognised, nor does he appreciate the damage these protests have done to the ecological protection groups of Russia in their domestic battle with the Russian oligarchs. Instead, he endorses what he calls the Greenpeace plan “to hit more directly at the Soviet economy” when that organisation moved on from campaigning against US and French nuclear bomb testing to  targeting not only Soviet whaling in the North Pacific, but also Soviet fishing.  

The final reason is that the way Jones tells his story in a fashion that ironizes, sarcasticises, and misrepresents the whaling story, turns out to be blubber that has been cut up,  boiled,  and coloured into margarine for the last time to be spread on Russian toast in the mornings. That’s exceptionalism for you.

by Editor - Wednesday, May 17th, 2023
No Comments »

By John Helmer, Moscow
  @bears_with

It’s  unlikely Vladimir Zelensky has read Oscar Wilde’s well-known maxim: “Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery that mediocrity can pay to greatness.”

But for the idea that Ukrainian officials can draw more profit, and lose fewer of their countrymen on the battlefield, by making a flurry of tactical manoeuvres in several directions imitate a strategic offensive, and a successful one at that —  this is a scheme which is  neither great nor mediocre. It is also not flattery.  

It’s an attempt by the US officials giving Zelensky his running orders – Secretary of State Antony Blinken, Under Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, National Security Advisor Jacob Sullivan,  and Joseph Biden,  declared candidate for re-election as president – to create the appearance of what they told the New York Times is “their best hope…to make substantial gains… which could give [Ukraine] more leverage in any negotiations.”  

On May 12, in the first day of their scheme, 1,725 Ukrainian men were killed on the Donbass front. This is the worst day’s military casualty rate since the US coup in Kiev launched the war in February 2014.

According to the Financial Times, this killing didn’t happen. Instead, the headline reads: “Ukrainian counter-offensive takes shape with the first gains around Bakhmut.”  The Washington Post announced likewise: “How Ukrainian forces denied Russia victory in Bakhmut by Victory Day”.  The New York Times repeated:  “Ukraine’s Advances Near Bakhmut Expose Rifts in Russian Forces”.  According to this propaganda, these successes were bloodless on the Ukrainian side.

A NATO forces veteran observes: “An entire regiment has been destroyed. This is cynical trading in flesh.

by Editor - Sunday, May 14th, 2023
No Comments »

By John Helmer, Moscow
  @bears_with

In the war against Russia, Penny Wong (lead image, left) , the Australian Foreign Minister, has done more fighting with her feet than with her mouth.

Last August 5, at a meeting of ASEAN foreign ministers in Cambodia, Wong walked out during a speech by Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, declaring through a spokesman:  “Minister Wong could not sit through Lavrov’s attempt to justify the murder of innocent Ukrainians.”   

When Australians fighting on the Ukraine side of the front are killed, Wong chooses to say nothing at all.

At least four Australian soldiers had been reported in the Australian media to have been killed by the end of last December; at least of one of them had been serving in the Australian Army. To evade Australian law prohibiting Australians from combat in  foreign mercenary units, three were classified as medics. In each death Wong’s ministry announced it was providing “consular assistance to the family”.  

By the end of February, the number of Australian KIA (Killed in Action) was still at four.   

Last week, Boris Rozhin’s Telegram site, known as “Colonel Cassad”, announced details of the death of a fifth Australian and the wounding of an American. They were shot while travelling together in a civilian car in an unidentified location.  

When the combat death of the fifth Australian was announced on May 6 by the Russians, Wong was asked to confirm his name and state of origin, and also to provide a count of Australians killed in the war so far. Wong’s spokesman said “we’re looking into your query.” Wong and her aides then went silent, and have refused to answer several follow-up emails.

It’s a silence of lambs trying to dissemble in wolves’ clothing.  

by Editor - Wednesday, May 10th, 2023
No Comments »

By John Helmer, Moscow
  @bears_with

The pro-war English writers supporting the arming of the Ukrainians with depleted uranium ammunition* have no brains.

The anti-war English writers opposing depleted uranium ammunition have no spines.

Has the kingdom of the English ever been so self-deluded on the page and so depleted on the battlefield?  

Yes once, four hundred years ago, when King James I sent the first ambassador to the Mughal empire of India ruled by Jahangir ((lead image, left and right) to exchange gifts and threats for exclusive trading rights. The ambassador was Sir Thomas Roe (left), between September 1615 and February 1619.  But Roe spent most of his years in India squatting over the toilet bowl with chronic dysentery and complaining to his friends at court in London and to his superiors at the East India Company at his lack of cash to impress the Indians and his lack of force to coerce them.

To solve these problems when Roe was upright, he plotted piracy at sea, sabotage and extortion  on land against the Portuguese, Dutch, Spanish and French —  and a protection racket against the Indians which they dismissed with a laugh.   This is how the English empire began in India – with a dysenteric bang. It is still ending with a dysenteric whimper. In between, a great deal of English shit which they turned into Indian gold.

Now that King Charles III has his own Indian for prime minister in London, Rishi Sunak (right), he is also plotting to replace India’s prime minister,  Narendra Modi,  at next year’s election in New Delhi. But that’s a story for another time.

For the time being, the new king has been compelled to remove the Koh-i-Noor diamond from the queen’s crown during last week’s coronation; that’s because Modi is demanding its return.

The announcement from Buckingham Palace didn’t admit the king’s hand had been forced by the Indians. “Some minor changes and additions,” according to the king’s spokesman, “will be undertaken by the Crown Jeweller, in keeping with the longstanding tradition that the insertion of jewels is unique to the occasion, and reflects the Consort’s individual style.”

The diamond remains locked up in the Tower of London; Modi hasn’t got it back yet.

by Editor - Tuesday, May 9th, 2023
No Comments »

By John Helmer, Moscow
  @bears_with

To an alien from another planet, where curiosity starts with naivety, the question is being asked why earthlings calling themselves the state media of Russia report analysis of an attack on the most obvious symbol of their state from two Americans who have spent their active service careers sworn to defeat what that symbol stands for — one of them in the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and the other in the US Marine Corps (USMC).

Having retired years ago, and lacking access to the secret CIA and USMC intelligence which  was once their stock in trade, everything they know about Russia comes – they sometimes admit – from Russia.

The naïve but curious alien might therefore be forgiven for asking the earthlings to explain why the following headlines in the Russian state news agency Sputnik could possibly be believable – at least to an alien: “Former CIA Officer Reveals Possible Motive Behind Kremlin Drone Attack”; and “Scott Ritter on Kremlin Strike: Zelensky Gov ‘Now a Legitimate Target’”.

How could these two retired warfighting soldiers against Russia possibly know?

The answer to this, the alien acknowledges,  he can’t answer directly. So he has asked twelve  naïve questions in this TNT Radio broadcast of  War of the Worlds.  

by Editor - Sunday, May 7th, 2023
No Comments »

By John Helmer, Moscow
  @bears_with

Pushkin House is the only London platform for anti-Russian propaganda which publishes an annual financial report revealing where its money comes from. The organisation calls itself a charity, according to UK law, whose “principal aim”, it claims in its regular filings to UK Companies House, “is to serve as an independent centre exploring the great richness of Russian culture, language and civilisation.”

It is anything but independent. That’s because the organisation,  which has lasted in London for almost seventy years in promotion of Russian culture,  has been making large financial losses promoting war against Russia,  and the Ukrainian destruction of Pushkin and everything else Russian in body or in book or monument form.  Supporting the Ukrainian side in the war, however, has cost the trust which owns Pushkin House’s headquarters and operations a deficit in  2022 of £117,627.  It’s the biggest financial loss in the Trust’s history.

It would have been much greater, however, if not for the financial backing of the British government. It has given more than two-thirds of the donation and grant income received in each of the past two years. The government has replaced Alexei Navalny, who appeared as a major donor in 2018 when the auditors called the source of the money “Future of Russia”, a political party which, under British law, cannot legally give money to charities like Pushkin House.    

The British government is just as uninhibited. But in the UK, attacking Russia and backing the regime in Kiev either make a lawful tax-deductible charity, or else they are an illegal violation of the Charities Act.

by Editor - Wednesday, May 3rd, 2023
No Comments »

By John Helmer, Moscow
  @bears_with

A Berlin court judge has dismissed a charge of threatening public order by a speech by Heinrich Buecker (lead image, left) last year for which he has been prosecuted for “publicly approving a crime of aggression”. Buecker  is a well-known Berlin anti-war activist and critic of the German government’s war against Russia in the Ukraine.  His speech was given in a Berlin park last June 22 on the 81^st  anniversary of the German invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941.

In a 90-minute courtroom session on April 27, guarded by five armed police, Judge Marieluis Brinkmann  (right) of the Tiergarten District Court of Berlin (at rear of lead image) interrupted and stopped Buecker testifying in what the judge dismissed as “a history lesson”; refused to accept from his defence lawyer mainstream German media publications  and Bundestag reports as evidence that Buecker’s opinions had been circulating widely in public before he spoke at the Berlin rally;  and would not allow legal argument on Article 5, the free speech provision of the German constitution known as the Basic Law.

Instead, Judge Brinkmann  ruled that an earlier conviction and fine for Buecker in the Tiergarten District Court in January should be dismissed because his speech had been a private one in front of Buecker’s “fans”, not a public speech at all.  

This is a new interpretation of law for which there is no German constitutional precedent. Article 5 draws no distinction between private and public speech; or the size of the audiences which are covered by the constitution; “every person,” the text says, “shall have the right freely to express and disseminate his opinions in speech, writing and pictures, and to inform himself without hindrance from generally accessible sources.”

The Berlin judge also broke German court precedent and judicial practice by announcing in her ruling a finding of fact and law about which she had refused to allow any evidence or argument to be presented and tested in court.  In the Ukraine, she announced, Russia is waging a “war of aggression in violation of international law.”

In her ruling the judge signalled that the German authorities want to prevent the Buecker case from becoming a rallying cause for free speech advocates across the country. “They want the issue to go away as quickly as possible,” Buecker said. “They realize it’s becoming too public.”

by Editor - Tuesday, May 2nd, 2023
No Comments »

By John Helmer, Moscow
  @bears_with

by Editor - Monday, May 1st, 2023
No Comments »

By John Helmer, Moscow
  @bears_with

First, the news from the front as George Eliason reports on his tour this week of the civilian  destruction and mass grave sites at  Popasnaya, Kremennaya,  and Severodonetsk in the Lugansk region. Then from the federal court in Worcester, Massachusetts, a Department of Justice document making fresh revelations in the John Teixeira case that hint at a plea bargain which the US media are covering up. And then from Canada’s west coast, guest Chris “Gorilla Radio” Cook on what the US has already made of Canada, and what will happen when the Ukrainian diaspora faces the capitulation of the regime in Kiev and Lvov.

by Editor - Sunday, April 30th, 2023
No Comments »